Skip to main content
Log in

A systematic histological study of palm fruits. VI. Subtribe Linospadicinae (Arecaceae)

  • Articles
  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pericarp structure of representative species of the four genera of the subtribe Linospadicinae is described and compared. Tissues found in the pericarp of this group are similar to those found in other subtribes of the Areceae, with no characters unique to the subtribe and nothing to suggest its closest affinities. The four genera, as well as each species examined, do show distinctive pericarp features, however.Laccospadix andLinospadix are similar, both with a single series of fibrous, bundles and an outer series of prominent raphide-bearing cells dominating the pericarp. In bothHowea andCalyptrocalyx, a complex exocarp forms from a series of fibrous bundles and brachysclereids, but each genus has other distinctive characters.Howea has vascular bundles in the exocarp zone, an outer series of raphide-bearing cells, and a conspicuously thickened locular epidermis. Based on a limited sample of four species, raphide-bearing cells appear to be always interior to the exocarp inCalyptrocalyx, and the locular epidermis is thin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Asmussen, C. B. &M. W. Chase. 2001. Coding and noncoding plastid DNA in palm systematics. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 1103–1117.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dowe, J. L. &M. D. Ferrero. 2001. Revision ofCalyptrocalyx and the New Guinea species ofLinospadix (Linospadicinae: Arecoideae: Arecaceae). Blumea 46: 207–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • — &A. K. Irvine. 1997. A revision ofLinospadix in Australia, with the description of a new species. Principes 41: 192–197, 211–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Essig, F. 1977. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. I. ThePtychosperma alliance. Syst. Bot. 2: 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &N. Hernandez. 2002. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. V. Subtribe Archontophoenicinae (Arecaceae). Brittonia 54: 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — &B. Young. 1979. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. II. TheAreca alliance. Syst. Bot. 4: 16–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,T. Manka &L. Bussard. 1999. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. III. Subtribe Iguanurinae (Arecaceae). Brittonia 51: 307–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —,L. Bussard &N. Hernandez. 2001. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. IV. Subtribe Oncospermatinae (Arecaceae). Brittonia 53: 466–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, W. J. 2002. A molecular phylogenetic study of the Palmae (Arecaceae) based on atpB, rbcL and 18S nr DNA sequences. Syst. Biol. 51: 92–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. E. & J. J. Doyle. In press. A phylogenetic analysis of tribe Areceae (Arecaceae) isomg twp pw-copy nuclear genes. Pl. Syst. Evol.

  • Uhl, N. &J. Dransfield. 1987. Genera Palmarum: a classification of palms based on the work of Harold E. Moore, Jr. L. H. Bailey Hortorium and the International Palm Society, Ithaca, New York; Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Essig, F.B. A systematic histological study of palm fruits. VI. Subtribe Linospadicinae (Arecaceae). Brittonia 54, 196–201 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1663/0007-196X(2002)054[0196:ASHSOP]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1663/0007-196X(2002)054[0196:ASHSOP]2.0.CO;2

Key words

Navigation